![]() |
|
| When he was
elected to the Royal Society in 1667, Ismaël Boulliau (1605-1694)
was over sixty years old. An early Copernican, Keplerian, and defender
of Galileo, Boulliau's contribution was to an earlier age, to the halcyon
days of the Mersenne Circle, the Cabinet Dupuy, and the first assemblies
that foreshadowed state-sponsored science. An able astronomer, Boulliau
published widely in science and mathematics as well as in history, classical
studies, and theology. He was also active in the Republic of Letters.
As Harcourt Brown suggested some sixty years ago, Boulliau's ‘lively mind
reflects most of the movements, literary, social and philosophic, of his
age.' Of perhaps equal importance, Boulliau was a prolific correspondent
situated entre deux âges. Trafficking in information,
news, and gossip - scientific, literary, and political - his contribution
was to the generation between Mersenne and Oldenburg, to the passage from
érudit
to homme de science, from intelligencer to the scientific
journal. Evidence of his activities is abundant. His letters
survive in numbers that still stupefy.
The immediate difficulty in dealing with Boulliau focuses on making sense of his manuscript remains--in identifying and locating his letters, in tracing and analyzing the various strands of his epistolary web. But how are his letters to be brought into meaningful order? His correspondence network rivals the combined efforts of Mersenne and Oldenburg with some 5,000 letters for the years 1632-1693. Given the complexity and importance of Boulliau's network, it is useful to visualize its size and scope in simplest form - over space and time. Several decades
ago Robert Mandrou, the Annales historian, suggested a simple strategy
for studying and evaluating correspondence networks. The ingredients
are simple enough. Mandrou traced the contours of the Peiresc network from
existing lists of Peiresc's correspondents found at Carpentras. In
an effort to suggest the size and scope of Boulliau's network (if not its
importance) I have provided a similar geographical map and temporal graph
of letters to and from Boulliau known to have been exchanged over
a period of sixty years. It should also be noted that I have
proceeded differently from Mandrou by plotting letters not simply their
senders and recipients. The difference is significant but even this
strategy is not without serious deficiencies. The following illustration
is suggestive not exhaustive. It represents letters from only the
Collection
Boulliau (some 4200) not other collections or locations. However
crude, it provides an outline in terra firma.
|
| A comparison of the Boulliau network and those of N-C Fabri de Peiresc (1580-1637), Marin Mersenne (1588-1648), and Henry Oldenburg (1619?-1677) can be found in my chapter 'Between Erudition and Science: The Archive and Correspondence Network of Ismaël Boulliau' in Archives of the Scientific Revolution, Chpt 4, Boydell & Brewer (UK) 1998. If you have questions or comments, please e-me at the following address. |
rah.feb.98 et seq
|
|