Marsilio
Ficino: Liber de sole (1487), Chapter 4
In
the heavens, definite spaces are noted in regard to the sun itself, within
which the planets wander and regularly change their motions. . . Venus
and Mercury wander a certain limited distance to and from the Sun. Venus
is restricted to 49 degrees and Mercury to 28 degrees. . . The superior
planets ascend as they approach the sun and descend as they go away from
the sun. At conjunction with the Sun they are at the highest point of their
epicycles, at opposition they are at the lowest point, and in quadrature
they are at a mean altitude.
Nicolas
Copernicus: De Revolutionibus (1543), I, 10.
Opinions
differ as to Venus and Mercury which, unlike the others, do not altogether
leave the sun. Some place them beyond the Sun, as Plato in his Timaeus;
others
nearer the Sun, as Ptolemy and many of the moderns . . . I think we must
seriously consider the ingenious view held by Martianus Capella . . .,
that Venus and Mercury do not go round the Earth like the other planets
but run their courses with the Sun at the center, and so do not depart
from him further than the size of their orbits is near the Sun ...
We
may extend this hypothesis to bring Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars into relation
with this center, making their orbits great enough to contain those of
Venus and Mercury and the Earth; and their proportional motions according
to the Table demonstrate this. These outer planets are always nearer to
the earth about the time of their evening rising, that is, when they are
in opposition to the Sun, and the Earth between them and the Sun. They
are more distant from the Earth at the time of their evening setting, when
they are in conjunction with the Sun and the Sun between them and the Earth.
These indications prove that their center pertains rather to the Sun than
to the Earth, and that this is the same center as that to which the revolutions
of Venus and Mercury are related.
Marsilio
Ficino: Liber de Sole, Chapter 6
All
locate the Sun, like a lord, in the center of the world, although for different
reasons. The Chaldeans, for instance, [place it] in the middle of the planets,
the Egyptians actually [place it] between two quintuple worlds, as surely
the five planets are above it, and below it are the moon and the five elements.
. . [Some] actually postulate the disposition of the Sun in this way, such
that Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars are elevated above it, while on the other
hand, Venus, Mercury, and the Moon are below the Sun, which proceeds as
a king, taking the middle way. Going by other ways, weaker ones avoid him.
Nicolas
Copernicus: De Revolutionibus, I, 10.
In
the middle of all sits the Sun enthroned. In this most beautiful temple
could we place this luminary in any better position from which he can illuminate
the whole at once? He is rightly called the Lamp, the Mind, the Ruler of
the Universe; Hermes Trismegistus names him the Visible God, Sophocles'
Electra calls him the All-seeing. So the Sun sits as upon a royal throne
ruling his children the planets which circle round him.
|