Brief Introdution to Marxist Critical Thought
by Professor Stephanie A. Smith


Classical Marxism, as conceived by Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820-1895) (drawing on the work of G.
W. F. Hegel [1770-1831]), developed a materialist theory of history. According to Marx and Engels, all social and cultural
forms, relationships, and identities are derived from the particular economic system of any given historical era. The particular
mode of production of an historical era formed the base structure of society; all other aspects, including literature, religion, and even
identities (one’s sense of self), were aspects of the superstructure growing out of the economic structure.
Particular economic systems will thus produce particular forms of literature and subjectivities: the novel,
and most specifically the "realist" novel is a product of capitalism, replacing earlier forms (i.e. medieval romance, epic)
particular to aristocratic and monarchic rule.  See also Lukas, The Theory of the Novel, and Gramsci.

In any economic system, those who control the modes of production will control society; their thinking, values, and
perspectives will be dominant.  Ideology prevents the dispossessed of any economic system from seeing their real
relationship to power structures. Ideology, in classical Marxism, produces a false consciousness of oneself and one's
relationship to history; ideology is that which is taken to be common sense or undisputed truth, i.e. Woman is the weaker sex.
So a capitalist system is dependent on ideologies like meritocracy ("anyone can grow up to be president") that mask
the realities of exploitation and privilege and keep the proletariat (working class) subjugated to the bourgeoisie (middle class)
who grow rich on the surplus value of labor. It is this surplus value that creates capital--not money, but the
accumulation of wealth that accrues to the class who own means of production. Through this process, the labor of the
proletariat becomes alienated.

Louis Althusser (1918-1990) modified Marxist understandings of ideology. For Althusser, ideology is not exactly a
false system of ideas but rather the conceptual framework through which one interprets self, culture, and history.
Ideology saturates everything, from language to cultural practices. Both the oppressors and the oppressed see the
world through the same screen of ideology. Human life as we understand it is dependent on a functioning ideology
that makes sense of self and world. So ideology produces not only our culture (the superstructure) but our very
consciousness of ourselves. Thus there is no essential individual human subject that pre-exists society; rather society
creates subjectivities and teaches us how to be "subject." Althusser contrasts ideological state apparatuses--the political
system, religion, schools, advertising, the law, the media, sports--that evoke willing submission to dominant culture with repressive
state apparatuses like prisons and the military that compel submission. For Althusser, there is very little hope for social
change or betterment because of the pervasive and invisible dominance of ideology and ideological state apparatuses.  For
Althusser, interpellation is a key factor--the way in which ideological state apparatuses call forth a particular identity
that we then recognize in ourselves, i.e. the way in which an advertising campaign can create a desire to be or look in a
certain way. We "see ourselves" or hear ourselves spoken to in the image and findour identity in buying the product.
You've Come a Long Way Baby!  Be a Sassy Girl.

Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) explored the concept, then, of hegemony, the notion that domination in a capitalist
economy is not achieved through force but through complex negotiations among various interests. Dominance
is never imposed from the top down nor is it articulated univocally through language or ideological apparatuses.
Hegemony is achieved not primarily through compulsion, but rather, through continual negotiation and the winning of
active or inactive consent from a majority of parties.

There is more, of course...particularly with respect to how gender is and is not a part of Marxist analysis.



Another Introduction to Marxism
Marxist Encyclopedia